• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer
Schedule Online
800-499-0994
Guardian Interlock

Guardian Ignition Interlock

The Original Ignition Interlock System

  • Locations
  • Pricing & Device
    • Our Device
    • Ignition Interlock Pricing
    • Ignition Interlock Program
    • Special Offers
    • Ignition Interlock Device Information
  • State Laws
  • Support
    • FAQ
    • Contact Us
    • Training Videos
  • Resources
    • About Us
    • Reviews
    • Become a Provider
    • Partners
      • DUI Attorneys
      • Recovery Counselors
      • Monitoring Authorities
      • Road Safety Resources
  • 800-499-0994

New Mexico Implied Consent Laws Head To Supreme Court

You are here: Home / Law / New Mexico Implied Consent Laws Head To Supreme Court
November 24, 2017 by Matt Talley
New Mexico implied consent laws

New Mexico implied consent lawsNew Mexico implied consent laws, like other state implied consent laws, are usually pretty clear: if police suspect you of drinking and driving, they have the right to ask you to submit to a breathalyzer. But a recent Albuquerque, New Mexico case has changed the way New Mexico implied consent laws can be used, and they had to go all the way to the state Supreme Court to do it.

According to New Mexico implied consent law, the police have the power to force you to take a breathalyzer test. If you refuse, they can charge you for that refusal or ask you to submit to a chemical test. When one woman arrived at a DWI checkpoint in 2011, she did submit to two breathalyzer tests. Her score on both tests was 0.04.

The arresting officer suspected she was high on drugs, so he asked her to submit to a blood test too. She refused the blood draw, and the officer charged her with both DWI and refusal to submit. When she went to court she appealed the refusal to submit charge.

While she was waiting, the U.S. Supreme Court made a ruling that was relevant to her case. The ruling stated that anyone arrested for DWI can be punished for refusing to submit to a breath test, but they can’t be punished for refusing to submit to a blood test unless the police officer has a warrant or the driver has injured or killed someone.

Because there was no warrant on record and the offender hasn’t injured someone, the New Mexico Court of Appeals overturned her charge. That’s when the state prosecutors appealed to the Supreme Court, but that didn’t change the outcome: the Supreme Court agreed with the court of appeals.

New Mexico implied consent law is there to protect drivers in the state, and it still stands despite the Supreme Court ruling about requesting blood work. There’s one easy way to avoid the worry of whether or not you’d submit to a breathalyzer test, and that’s to always drive sober.

Category: LawTag: Drunk Driving, New Mexico

About Matt Talley

Previous Post: « Happy Thanksgiving from Guardian Interlock
Next Post: Washington DUI Law Changes To Add DUI-E Washington DUI »

24/7 Bilingual Customer Service

Call now on 800-499-0994 and we’ll help you get back on the road

Call Now
Guardian Interlock Logo
800-499-0994
Locations
Pricing & Device

Our Device

Ignition Interlock Pricing

Special Offers

Interlock Program

State Laws
Support

FAQs

Contact Us

Training Videos

Resources

About Us

Reviews

Become A Provider

Partners

DUI Attorneys

Recovery Counselors

Monitoring

Training Videos

Road Safety Resources

© Copyright 2023 Guardian Interlock, LLC

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use