• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer
Schedule Online
800-499-0994
Guardian Interlock

Guardian Ignition Interlock

The Original Ignition Interlock System

  • Locations
  • Pricing & Device
    • Our Device
    • Ignition Interlock Pricing
    • Ignition Interlock Program
    • Special Offers
    • Ignition Interlock Device Information
  • State Laws
  • Support
    • FAQ
    • Contact Us
    • Training Videos
  • Resources
    • About Us
    • Reviews
    • Become a Provider
    • Partners
      • DUI Attorneys
      • Recovery Counselors
      • Monitoring Authorities
      • Road Safety Resources
  • 800-499-0994

Utah: Implied Consent Doesn’t Apply When You’re Unconscious.

You are here: Home / Law / Utah: Implied Consent Doesn’t Apply When You’re Unconscious.
September 25, 2017 by Matt Talley
Utah drunk driving

Utah drunk driving What happens if you crash your vehicle, are taken to the hospital unconscious, and police suspect you of drunk driving? You know hospital personnel will take care of you when you’re awake and able to talk, and they’re also responsible for your care when you’re unconscious.

But a lot can happen when you’re not able to answer for yourself after a crash, and one Utah drunk driving case has cast a spotlight on the specific drunk driving laws that may come into play in situations like these.

By now everyone has seen the video of nurse Alex Wubbels refusing to allow blood to be drawn from her unconscious patient after a car crash. The police officer requesting the blood draw arrested her for refusing, and the video was uploaded online and went viral shortly after.

The dust has since settled on the case and the police officer responsible has been fired, but if you’re wondering why Wubbels refused to allow the police officer to draw blood and what responsibilities did the patient have to submit to testing, even if he was unconscious, the answer is fairly simple.

Supreme Court ruling on blood samples

This isn’t the first time the subject of blood draws without consent have come up in the United States. A case that went all the way to the Supreme Court ended with a ruling that a blood sample cannot be taken from a patient without consent or a warrant.

In this case the officer had neither a warrant or the patient’s consent, but what was on his side – he believed – was the patient’s implied consent.

Utah implied consent

What is implied consent? In Utah, just like in many other states, the very act of accepting a driver’s license means that you agree to submit to a blood, breath, or urine test should a police officer suspect you of drunk driving. That implied consent will apply if you’re pulled over by police, but experts weighing in on this Utah drunk driving case have said it doesn’t apply for a blood draw in the Alex Wubbels situation.

Only lawyers know how to interpret the specifics of Utah drunk driving laws, but it’s a good case for anyone to look at because it demonstrates the different ways implied consent can be interpreted in any state.

Category: LawTag: Implied Consent, Law Enforcement, Utah

About Matt Talley

Previous Post:suspected drunk driverFriday fallout: How Much Damage Can A Suspected Drunk Driver Do?
Next Post:PSAs In Virtual World Could Stop Someone From Being Arrested For DUIarrested for drunk driving gamer study

24/7 Bilingual Customer Service

Call now on 800-499-0994 and we’ll help you get back on the road

Call Now
Guardian Interlock Logo
800-499-0994
Locations
Pricing & Device

Our Device

Ignition Interlock Pricing

Special Offers

Interlock Program

State Laws
Support

FAQs

Contact Us

Training Videos

Resources

About Us

Reviews

Become A Provider

Partners

DUI Attorneys

Recovery Counselors

Monitoring

Training Videos

Road Safety Resources

© Copyright 2023 Guardian Interlock, LLC

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use